roll up your rim
"Pay..."
"...Play Again".
It's a disease.
Try to make sense of every little thing at 2 AM.
“Eastern Ontario and western Quebec were rattled by a gentle earthquake on Friday night, the Geological Survey of Canada says. The tremor, with a magnitude of 4.5, was too gentle to cause damage, government seismologist Sylvia Hayek said.” - CBCWe had a mild earthquake here about 8:45 PM, enough to shake the house and have an audible rumble. I think it lasted about 5 seconds. I immediately searched the web for information and it turned out the Americans had the data before we even did. The Canadian seismology site was down (probably overwhelmed with hits) and when it did work, there was no firm data on the quake. Pretty useless to have a web page re: earthquakes that doesn't work when we have an earthquake.
I must admit to being rather down and out. After visiting the clinic for a two hour wait, I’ve walked out with not only my chest pains still intact, but also a rather terrible cold. It again may very well be my fourth inflection with a virus this year. It’s scary how sensitive I am. I am seeing a docter this weekend for a series of tests. Everything should be fine, just cut me some slack. That’s what happens when you take time to consider yourself amongst those in the outside world. No matter how much you wash your hands or use sanitizer, you’re just bound to pick something up. Everything is out to get you. But don’t worry about me though, I’ll be fine.
I think.
The following may be ironic, but watching someone you once knew lose their mind from a distance is somewhat sad, especially if you considered yourself friends at a time in your lives. Listening to the anecdotes of others regarding their slide into oblivion is both depressing and telling in a aching sort of self-awareness trip. And though you’ve lost all contact with them, you hope that some of the information that has reached you is accurate, such as telling of gainful stability. To discover that such information is, in fact, false, only makes it more apparent that professional help is required, and all you can do is hope that it is sought sooner than later."I wish you would just shoot yourself before somebody else would and get it over with. It's the only way to shut up people like you." - CommentatorThere are many people in the world that are of course morons. It's obvious enough and not exactly a new development. Of course the problem is that 90% of them consider themselves not to be and would agree with the sentiment that, in fact, the world is full of morons. Therein lies the difficultly in eradicating the problem. Now, it's not as if I haven't received threats via e-mail before. I've been threatened numerous times by numerous individuals of anonymity. There is something to be said for the realities of today. The usual things such as encountering difficulties in public, the stares, the comments, the rumours, and so forth. All of which are rather easy to ignore if you're the sort that doesn't much care. Because, in truth, what does it really matter? You can only be knocked off of a pedestal if you consider yourself to be on one. The truth of life is that you're here, you live it, and then you're gone. You can attempt to convince yourself otherwise, but there it is. You get one time on the ride. If you allow it to be effected by the attitudes and dictates of others then what's the point?
For the past decade, Sierra Leone has been wracked by a brutal war led be an armed group called the Revolutionary United Front. The RUF terrorizes Sierra Leone's local population, and controls the country's diamond-rich regions. The RUF funds their reign of terror with the sale of $200 million of diamonds a year. The RUF's terror tactics include: killing, raping and abduction. But their trademark is amputating the limbs and body parts of men, women, children, and babies. Ineffective regulations allow these "conflict diamonds" to enter the international diamond market. America consumes 65 percent of the world's diamonds. Refuse to take part.It's not just Sierra Leone, but Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Liberia. While there have been efforts to create certification processes to establish the origin of diamonds, there is no guarantee that the diamonds you buy haven't been smuggled across borders, or had certification forged. Doesn't much matter, anyway, seeing as only a quarter of American shops have a policy on conflict diamonds, and 83 percent of American consumers just don't ask about it.
Corporations sure are super duper.
Would anyone including you do just about anything for the all-mighty dollar? Would they, could they deny citizens access to information? Sure, no problem (see: google). Provide additional information to a government that results in the denial of human rights? Anything to help! You’d think this would be bigger news. But can you really say you’re all that surprised? In light of the daily occurrences in our world, and what we’ve learned to tolerate, I think this a meagre offering."The internet giant Yahoo has been accused of providing China with information that led to the jailing of a second internet writer. Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders claims that Yahoo released data which led to the arrest of Li Zhi.
The online writer was jailed for eight years in 2003, after posting comments that criticised official corruption.
Last year Yahoo was accused of giving information to Beijing which led to the imprisonment of reporter Shi Tao.
Reporters Without Borders called on Yahoo to release the names of all internet writers whose identities it has revealed to the Chinese authorities." - BBC
Then It dawns on me.
I’ve nothing to say today that hasn’t been said more than once in the past. All one need do is scan the pages of the world’s newspapers to realize we’re on the brink of something, that this is a time to choose to either make your voice heard or bury your head in the sand. What will I tell my children when they are old enough to understand the importance of this global fight, of this crucial time in our shared history? That their parents willfully chose to remain ignorant and silent when they could have involved themselves and lent their voices to a growing global choir demanding justice and accountability for more than just themselves? I cannot, in good conscience, live with being guilty of such irresponsibility. Because this isn’t just about one war, or one reckless government, or the exploitation of one country and its people. This is about the path that we, as citizens of free nations, must work to alter. This is about becoming more than votes within a system, more than a marginal voice in a landscape of apathy and easily disregarded public discontent. This is about ensuring that we are not so easily bemused, not so ignorant that we don’t know the difference between manipulation and information. We must work to reclaim the dignity of those practices that have been stolen and sullied by corporate interests and the greed of those who profit from our continued degradation. This is about taking responsibility for the actions of our governments, not claiming ourselves innocent of their crimes because we lacked the courage to forcibly confront them.
We have reached a crucial point of decision. Do we raise our children in a world in which we continue to be regarded as peons that represent little more than means to political ends, or do we raise them in a world in which people actively embrace the realization that the status quo is something that must always be challenged and questioned? For if not by us, then who? If not now, then when?
Of all the things, I’ll throw down, I remember this piece of crap the most. It was one of those things that you write when you’ve come to the end of your rope and the only thing that’s keeping you going is the fact that you can’t remember how to stop.
"Easy isn’t for the free. Easy is for the willfully confined. So how easy do you want it?"
[Don] Page, a long time resident of the town, complained to the Ontario Fire Marshal that volunteer firefighters had not shown enough diligence in fighting a house fire that killed a local woman. Page and his wife, Jean Purcell, were one of the first witnesses on scene.Lest ye not wait for lotto but sue instead. The Guide to Living the Canadian Dream, the Good Old American way. Attempting to sue a concerned citizen who is bold enough to speak out against perceived wrong-doing is extremely heavy-handed. Mr. Page did not attack the reputation of any individual - he criticized the training methods that the municipal fire service employed. If this case had been successful a legal precedent would have been set that would have allowed any government in Canada to effectively muzzle dissenters. Thankfully, common sense prevailed:
Justice Kenneth Pedlar said the lawsuit is contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and he also cited the Municipal Act and international precedents for helping to form his opinion.Translation: Canadians are free to criticize the government; however defaming individuals in government is still not acceptable. Before I move on to wasting away my creative energy consciously allowing myself to return to servitude, I wanted to ask, where do you stand on the issues of:
"In a free and democratic system, every citizen must be guaranteed the right to freedom of expression relating to government as an absolute privilege," Pedlar stated in a 13-page decision released .
Moreover, Pedlar said it is unnecessary to even consider whether statements by Page against municipal council and the fire department were, indeed, defamatory.
But he warned against interpreting the decision "in any way as an encouragement to those who might engage in the making of irresponsible defamatory statements against government."
Individual members of government may still sue for defamation to protect their personal reputations, said Pedlar.
"Perhaps all human beings - are in the grip of an astonishing delusion. We think that we can take a picture, a structure, a working knowledge of something, constructed in our minds out of long experience and familiarity, and by turning that model into a string of words, transplant it whole into the mind of someone else.
Perhaps once in a thousand times, when the explanation is extraordinarily good, and the listener extraordinarily experienced and skillful at turning word-strings into non-verbal reality, and when the explainer and listener share in common many of the experiences being talked about, the process may work, and some real meaning may be communicated. Most of the time, explaining does not increase understanding, and may even lessen it." - John Holt (1923-1985) from How Children Learn.
Being one who writes often of the frustration in dealing with a system that is dysfunctional, bureaucratic, co-opted by corporatists, nevertheless, I still want to make a difference. I suggest, no, I encourage telling it like it is:
I have been blogging lately about how systems worldwide discriminate, demotivate, subjugate and demoralize most, especially young people, teaching them not to think, but just to consume, and to allow the established, moneyed and powerful elites to pass on their business and political empires to their children. And then, broken by that system, most young people willingly and gratefully work and grow old at boring, unfulfilling jobs, in constant fear of unemployment, and blame themselves for not doing better in our lands of supposedly unlimited opportunity.
It leaves little doubt to me that subjugation and wage slavery were the intended purposes of public education systems when they first formed. What is hard to fathom is that, given the effort and desire of most public school teachers to give young people the best education possible, the system seems to perpetuate itself generation after generation and the gap between the elite and the rest of society grows massively wider every year.
Why is this? I think teachers are caught in the system's net themselves, and would probably be the first to admit that the rules under which they must work largely undermine their ability to actually teach anything.
What would happen if we reformed the education system so that it didn't perpetuate the cycle of economic fear, political apathy, social guilt, and self-loathing?
Let's consider what such a system might look like, starting with objectives. I would suggest it should strive to do just two things: (a) Provide the skills, and ability to apply them, needed to make a comfortable, enjoyable, fulfilling living (as owner of or partner in an enterprise, not as an employee); (b) Provide the skills, and ability to apply them, needed to be an informed, contributing member of society (in other words, to be a good citizen and get along with others).
It's about applying and reapplying these skills to our unlearned selves; the tasks of making a living and being a good citizen best taught by people who are actually doing it, where they are doing it, not by teachers and not in classrooms. If some young lady visits a team doing land surveying and decides she might want to make a living doing that, she should be equipped, and encouraged, to identify the resources needed to pursue that calling and apply herself to acquiring the knowledge and talent needed to do that. If surveyors have a professional qualifying examination, that, and not some standard pre-set grade-school examination program, should be her self-set gauge of accomplishment.Some basic life skills…
Creative Skills: -Ideation: Coming up with new ideas
-Representation/Spacial Skills: Capturing, applying and executing these ideas.Language Skills:
-Written Communication
-Oral Communication
-Non-Verbal Communication
Knowledge Processing Skills:
-Synthesis: Distilling and summarizing information
-Analysis: Breaking down information
-Interpretation: Determining what information means; adding insight.
Interpersonal Skills:
-Sensing: Listening and appreciation
-Connecting: Engaging, sympathizing, organizing and relating
-Persuading
The 'teacher's' role in all of this is facilitation, not instruction. That means setting up opportunities for students to meet and see and talk with people who make their living in different ways. It means ensuring they have access to the learning resources they need, and steering them in the right direction to learn how to use them. It means arranging and coordinating the discussions. It would require that all of us making a living now set aside a significant amount of time to show, and talk with students about, what we do and how and why we do it. It might well require a lot more 'teachers' than we have today, though it would save billions by eliminating curriculum development, textbooks, school buildings, and the administration that accounts for much more than half of the current education budget.The implications of doing this would be staggering. There would be no employees, no labour pool for large corporations to dip into. I don't think many corporations would mind this at all. They have already basically transformed most jobs into contracts and eliminated most employee benefits. The idea of converting every employee position into a supplier position is quite well understood by senior management and might even be welcomed.